The logic for doing this seems reasonable. You are in ‘ familiar ground’, you know the play, players, nuts and bolts. You will sound credible when you pitch your idea to future employees and investors. There is more ‘plausibility’ of it going right.
Here is the tricky part. Its ultimately a business which has to thrive on someone ( an individual or a business) parting their hard earned money for whatever you plan to offer. And they will do it ONLY if it solves a good enough problem or brings signicantly more value than the current options.
The tricky part is, just because your credentials are in a particular area, ‘must not’ mean that
- there is a huge problem there waiting to be solved or ( opportunity)
- the current solvers are not ‘good enough’ or that ( competition)
- there is a dramatically new way to solve the problem. ( reimagination)
Be willing to let go off the familiar ground, if you cannot satisfy the above. Remember, you dont control most of the above. On the other hand, you identify an area that meets the above criteria and its not where your past ‘credentials’ are, there is still an opportunity!
Do not let the familiarity dominate the business case. It may not be a ‘business case’ in the first place!
1 comment:
If points 1 and 3 are to be considered we would need to think hard why take that change up right?
Post a Comment